Loading…

Lipid-based formulations to increase cannabidiol bioavailability: In vitro digestion tests, pre-clinical assessment and clinical trial

[Display omitted] Herein, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), glyceryl monolinoleate (GML), and a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) for cannabidiol (CBD) delivery were compared using in vitro and in vivo (mouse and human) studies. In vitro digestion tests showed that SEDDS yielded the high...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pharmaceutics 2021-11, Vol.609, p.121159, Article 121159
Main Authors: De Prá, Manuel A.A., Vardanega, Renata, Loss, Carla G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] Herein, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), glyceryl monolinoleate (GML), and a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) for cannabidiol (CBD) delivery were compared using in vitro and in vivo (mouse and human) studies. In vitro digestion tests showed that SEDDS yielded the highest CBD recovery in the aqueous phase (86 ± 2%), followed by GML (13 ± 2%) and MCT (5.6% ± 0.8%). In vivo tests (mouse) revealed that SEDDS promoted the highest CBD exposure, exhibiting an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-6h) 1.48 times greater than GML and 3.97 times greater than that of the MCT formulation. A single-dose, open-label, crossover study performed in 11 volunteers showed that SEDDS increased CBD AUC0-12h by 1.12 and 1.48 times in relation to GML and MCT, respectively. The in vitro–in vivo correlation was r2 0.75 for mice and r2 0.66 for humans. The AUC correlation between mice and humans was 0.98. Collectively, these results indicate that the lipid profile substantially influences CBD delivery and highlights the potential of the SEDDS and GML formulations as candidate solutions for increasing CBD AUC and bioavailability.
ISSN:0378-5173
1873-3476
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121159