Loading…

Dimensions of brand-extension fit

•Brand-extension fit is constituted by six distinct dimensions.•Feature, function, resource, usage-occasion, target-market, and image-based fit.•Using a subset of these dimensions leads to biased importance of the used ones.•The six-dimension fit model can help managers achieve better consumer respo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of research in marketing 2022-09, Vol.39 (3), p.764-787
Main Authors: Deng, Qian (Claire), Messinger, Paul R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Brand-extension fit is constituted by six distinct dimensions.•Feature, function, resource, usage-occasion, target-market, and image-based fit.•Using a subset of these dimensions leads to biased importance of the used ones.•The six-dimension fit model can help managers achieve better consumer responses. A sizable research stream in marketing finds that a strong fit between a brand extension product and its parent brand encourages positive consumer responses. Yet this large body of literature fails to provide managers with specific practical guidance about how to create brand-extension fit for optimal results. The problem is a lack of understanding of what brand-extension fit really is, and there has been little work to address this issue by synthesizing the key dimensions of brand-extension fit. The current article addresses this gap by identifying the key constituent dimensions of brand-extension fit. This is an important topic because brand extensions are essential for business renewal and growth. We identify six dimensions of brand-extension fit: feature-based, function-based, resource-based, usage-occasion-based, market-based, and image-based fit. Each dimension addresses a different aspect of brand-extension fit and suggests ways for brand managers to create brand-extension fit. Less expected is that studies that use a strict subset of these dimensions overweight those fit dimensions that are included, and the associated estimated coefficients are biased. From a managerial perspective, counterfactual analysis also shows that reliance on a strict subset of these dimensions results in suboptimal decisions.
ISSN:0167-8116
1873-8001
DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.013