Loading…

Disrupted or delayed? Stress discrimination among preterm as compared to full-term infants during the first year of life

•Our results suggest the prosodic sensitivity of preterm (PT) infants is not impaired.•PT infants’ stress processing was found to be disrupted and not delayed.•In PT infants the birth weight explained 21 % of the total variance of the P-MMR. Several papers pointed out that the language disorders are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Infant behavior & development 2021-02, Vol.62, p.101520, Article 101520
Main Authors: Varga, Zsuzsanna, Ragó, Anett, Honbolygó, Ferenc, Csépe, Valéria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Our results suggest the prosodic sensitivity of preterm (PT) infants is not impaired.•PT infants’ stress processing was found to be disrupted and not delayed.•In PT infants the birth weight explained 21 % of the total variance of the P-MMR. Several papers pointed out that the language disorders are the most commonly reported cognitive deficits of the preterm (PT) infants. However, neither the exact interpretation (disrupted or delayed) of their language development nor the most powerful perinatal risk factors have been specified yet. We aimed to determine whether postnatal development of prosodic processing of PT infants is disrupted or delayed in the first year of life? We also tested the role of Birth Weight (BW) and Gestational Age (GA) regarding the PT and full-term (FT) infants’ language perception. We registered the mismatch responses (MMR) of 34 PT (at 6 and 12 month of ages) and 33 FT infants (at 4 and 10 month of age) elicited by bisyllabic pseudo-words in two oddball conditions. Contrary to their FT peers, younger PT group detected stress changes of the legal stress form only. Analogously, a positive MMR (P-MMR) was found for the legal form discrimination exclusively in PT12 group. Furthermore, the lack of sensitivity to the standard vs. deviant difference was identified in the PT infants. In PT infants, BW explained 21 % of the total variance of the P-MMR. Consequently, we argue that the stress sensitivity of the PT infants is unimpaired, but their stress processing seems to be disrupted from the 6th month on. We suggest for further studies to take BW into account in studies using MMR paradigms in PT infants.
ISSN:0163-6383
1879-0453
DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101520