Loading…

Analyst coverage and the idiosyncratic skewness effect in the Taiwan stock market

In this study, we investigate the effect of analyst coverage on the idiosyncratic skewness (IS) anomaly. We adopt the ordinary least square method with the corresponding standard errors that are heteroskedasticity consistent and clustered by firm. Our results show that the IS anomaly exists in the T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International review of financial analysis 2023-01, Vol.85, p.102460, Article 102460
Main Author: Lin, Mei-Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, we investigate the effect of analyst coverage on the idiosyncratic skewness (IS) anomaly. We adopt the ordinary least square method with the corresponding standard errors that are heteroskedasticity consistent and clustered by firm. Our results show that the IS anomaly exists in the Taiwanese stock market, and analyst coverage mitigates it. Moreover, we use one exogenous shock on analysts due to the mergers and closures of brokerages to address the endogenous concern, and to confirm that analyst coverage reduces the IS anomaly. Specifically, the buy and upgrade recommendations of analysts mitigate the negative IS spreads, but their sell and downgrade recommendations aggravate those spreads. Further, we use a quasi-natural experiment on short-sale constraints in the Taiwanese stock market and find that the effects of analysts' recommendations on the negative IS spreads are not subsumed by those constraints. •This study investigate the effect of analyst coverage on the IS anomaly.•The buy and upgrade recommendations of analysts mitigate the negative IS spreads.•Analysts' sell and downgrade recommendations aggravate that spreads.•The effects of analysts' recommendations on the negative IS spreads are not subsumed by short-sale constraints.
ISSN:1057-5219
1873-8079
DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102460