Loading…

International policy coordination for financial regime stability under cross-border externalities

•This paper demonstrate that when banks are efficient, regulatory effort is a strategic complement.•Regulators face multiple equilibria if each of them responds in an overly sensitive manners.•Financial policy coordination is more likely among homogenous countries. This paper examines the conditions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of banking & finance 2018-12, Vol.97, p.177-188
Main Authors: Park, Sungmin, Kim, Young-Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•This paper demonstrate that when banks are efficient, regulatory effort is a strategic complement.•Regulators face multiple equilibria if each of them responds in an overly sensitive manners.•Financial policy coordination is more likely among homogenous countries. This paper examines the conditions for effective coordination in financial regulatory policy when banks are politically influential, considering cross-border externalities arising from multinational banking operation. We demonstrate that when banks are inefficient with high loan monitoring costs, regulatory effort is a strategic substitute so that each country's regulator tends to exert lower effort free-riding that of the other countries’ regulator. On the other hand, when banks are efficient with lower monitoring costs, regulatory effort is a strategic complement and regulators have lower incentives to free-ride. However, regulators face multiple equilibria and thus financial instability if each of them responds in an overly sensitive manner to another's strategy. In this case, introducing informational barriers can refine multiple equilibria into a unique equilibrium. The results suggest that cooperative financial policy coordination mechanism is more likely to be sustained among countries whose banking sectors’ political influence on regulators is smaller and more homogeneous.
ISSN:0378-4266
1872-6372
DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.002