Loading…

Revisiting loss aversion: Evidence from professional tennis

•A theoretical framework for the loss aversion in tennis is provided.•A novel data set from 2013 Dubai Tennis Championships was used to test our theory.•Semi parametric additive mixed models are used as empirical methodology.•Empirical results show loss aversion kicks in earlier for male players.•Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic behavior & organization 2018-09, Vol.153, p.1-18
Main Authors: Anbarci, Nejat, Arin, K. Peren, Kuhlenkasper, Torben, Zenker, Christina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A theoretical framework for the loss aversion in tennis is provided.•A novel data set from 2013 Dubai Tennis Championships was used to test our theory.•Semi parametric additive mixed models are used as empirical methodology.•Empirical results show loss aversion kicks in earlier for male players.•There is more loss aversion when stakes are higher. We provide further evidence for the existence of loss aversion in a high-stakes context: professional tennis. Our contribution to the literature is threefold: (1) We provide a theoretical framework as a basis of our investigation, (2) we test the predictions of our model by using a novel dataset for both male and female players from the Dubai Tennis Championships 2013 that not only includes the serve speed but also the serve location, and (3) we employ semiparametric Additive Mixed Models to include smooth one-, two- and three-dimensional interaction effects for modelling the serve speed and placement. Our results show that when behind in score players put more effort into the serve than when they are ahead. We also document that players take more risks in the final. Finally, we detect remarkable gender differences with respect to the incidence of loss aversion within a game versus within a set.
ISSN:0167-2681
1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.10.014