Civil unrest, emergency powers, and spillover effects: A mixed methods analysis of the 2005 French riots

From early to mid-November 2005, many French urban suburbs experienced riots. In the affected areas the government declared a state of emergency which gave the police extrajudicial powers. It remained in place until January. I investigate whether the riots generated criminal spillovers, whether the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic behavior & organization 2020-09, Vol.177, p.305-326
Main Author: Mechoulan, Stéphane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bounded variation assumptions
Crime
Emergency powers
Opportunism
Police
Riots
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From early to mid-November 2005, many French urban suburbs experienced riots. In the affected areas the government declared a state of emergency which gave the police extrajudicial powers. It remained in place until January. I investigate whether the riots generated criminal spillovers, whether the emergency powers deterred criminal activity, and whether the police used those powers opportunistically to bust crime unrelated to the riots. I supplement linear regressions with a non-parametric bounded-variation assumptions framework combined with a synthetic control approach, and interviews I conducted with two of the events’ key actors. Criminals did not take advantage of the riots to commit more crimes requiring planning. However, the riots triggered a surge of violent thefts. The state of emergency did not result in a decrease in delinquency. Several clues suggest a strategy of appeasement. Meanwhile, some serious crimes increased immediately after the riots ended, suggesting an emboldening effect. Evidence of police opportunism is scant.
ISSN:0167-2681
1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.019