Insights into chemical regeneration of activated carbon for water treatment

• Published in: Journal of environmental chemical engineering 2021-08, Vol.9 (4), p.105555, Article 105555
• Main Authors: Larasati, Amanda, Fowler, Geoffrey D., Graham, Nigel J.D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chemical regeneration; Granular activated carbon (GAC); Solvent regeneration; Water treatment
• ISSN: 2213-3437; 2213-3437
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105555

Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption has found wide application as a treatment process for the removal of natural organic matter, small organic compounds (e.g. pesticides), inorganic compounds (e.g. heavy metals), taste and odour compounds in water over many years. During GAC operation, contaminants are adsorbed and the carbon becomes progressively saturated over time, requiring periodic regeneration of the media to restore its capacity. Chemical regeneration has been identified as an effective alternative to off-site thermal regeneration, which is the most commonly practiced carbon regeneration technique for carbon exhausted by organic contaminants. Off-site thermal regeneration poses significant disadvantages as it is a time-consuming process and represents a significant operational cost (e.g. reduced productivity) and environmental (energy/CO2) burden to water utilities. Chemical regeneration can be performed on-site, either in situ or off-line, by exposing the spent (exhausted) GAC to a selected chemical, or a combination of chemicals, to remove the adsorbed contaminants. Prior research on chemical regeneration has been limited in extent, but has considered both organic and inorganic solutions. Despite a significant number of studies, a suitable regenerant solution for desorbing a wide range of aqueous contaminants in drinking water treatment has not been identified to-date. In this paper, we provide a critical review of the performance of alternative regenerant solutions for the chemical regeneration of GAC loaded with different organic contaminants. [Display omitted] •Chemical regeneration is a viable alternative to thermal regeneration of spent carbon.•The chemical regeneration efficacy depends on the type of adsorbate and regenerant.•Important properties of regenerant are polarity, hydrophobicity, pH, toxicity, etc.•The use of more than one types of regenerant increased regeneration efficiencies.