Loading…

Comprehensive uncertainty analysis for surface water and groundwater projections under climate change based on a lumped geo-hydrological model

Sustainable management of aquifers requires long-term predictions of their aquifer-scale groundwater balance under climate change with meaningfully quantified uncertainty. In our analysis, we account for uncertainty in model parameters, measured data, model errors, stochastic model inputs (e.g., rai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2023-11, Vol.626, p.130323, Article 130323
Main Authors: Ejaz, Fahad, Guthke, Anneli, Wöhling, Thomas, Nowak, Wolfgang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sustainable management of aquifers requires long-term predictions of their aquifer-scale groundwater balance under climate change with meaningfully quantified uncertainty. In our analysis, we account for uncertainty in model parameters, measured data, model errors, stochastic model inputs (e.g., rainfall, potential evapotranspiration), and climate scenarios. To afford this analysis, we rely on an extension of lumped hydrological models that includes groundwater flow and storage, called lumped geohydrological model (LGhM). It shows good model performance and is three orders of magnitude faster than 2D or 3D numerical groundwater models. We use Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for Bayesian inference on a calibration period to quantify posterior parameter uncertainty and lumped data-and-model error. Then, we perform Monte Carlo forward runs with stochastic weather inputs under three different climate scenarios to quantify uncertainty in long-term predictions up to the year 2040. We apply our approach on a virtual reality representation of the Wairau Plain aquifer, New Zealand. We hypothesize that the variability in future climate is the most important impact factor. To test this hypothesis, we disentangle the overall uncertainty between data/model, parameters, weather, and climate inputs. We expect our approach to be highly useful for arbitrary types of catchments because the LGhM model structure can easily be adapted. •Estimating uncertainty in long-term groundwater projections under climate change.•Estimating predictive uncertainty in a fully Bayesian framework.•Value-dependent error variances for hydrological variables.•Analyzing the impact of individual uncertainty sources on predictive uncertainty.
ISSN:0022-1694
DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130323