Loading…
Understanding and advancing graduate teaching assistants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching
•Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) mathematical meanings are often impoverished.•GTAs meanings for average rate of change are varied and can be resistant to change.•Mathematics GTA professional development must address mathematical content.•A GTA professional development program and effects on GTA...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of mathematical behavior 2017-03, Vol.45, p.137-149 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) mathematical meanings are often impoverished.•GTAs meanings for average rate of change are varied and can be resistant to change.•Mathematics GTA professional development must address mathematical content.•A GTA professional development program and effects on GTAs meanings are described.
Graduate student teaching assistants (GTAs) usually teach introductory level courses at the undergraduate level. Since GTAs constitute the majority of future mathematics faculty, their image of effective teaching and preparedness to lead instructional improvements will impact future directions in undergraduate mathematics curriculum and instruction. In this paper, we argue for the need to support GTAs in improving their mathematical meanings of foundational ideas and their ability to support productive student thinking. By investigating GTAs’ meanings for average rate of change, a key content area in precalculus and calculus, we found evidence that even mathematically sophisticated GTAs possess impoverished meanings of this key idea. We argue for the need, and highlight one approach, for supporting GTAs to improve their understanding of foundational mathematical ideas and how these ideas are learned. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-3123 1873-8028 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.011 |