Loading…

Downward nominal wage rigidity and state-dependent government spending multipliers

•Downward nominal wage rigidity generates business cycle-dependent government spending multipliers.•Government spending in recessions reduces unemployment and does not drive up the real interest rate as much as in expansions.•The baseline simulation generates an impact output multiplier of 1.37 in r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of monetary economics 2018-10, Vol.98, p.11-26
Main Authors: Shen, Wenyi, Yang, Shu-Chun S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Downward nominal wage rigidity generates business cycle-dependent government spending multipliers.•Government spending in recessions reduces unemployment and does not drive up the real interest rate as much as in expansions.•The baseline simulation generates an impact output multiplier of 1.37 in recession and of 0.54 in expansion.•The theoretical implications are consistent with empirical responses of key macro variables in the literature. Despite much empirical evidence on business cycle-dependent government spending multipliers, the theoretical channels underlying such results are uncertain. In an environment with involuntary unemployment, this paper shows that downward nominal wage rigidity, which arises only in recessions, can generate business cycle-dependent government spending multipliers. In line with Keynesian views, a demand stimulus reduces unemployment in recessions and may not drive up inflation and wages as in expansions. Thus, the positive income effects from reduced unemployment and weaker crowding-out effects from a smaller increase in the real interest rate enhance the expansionary spending effects in recessions. The theoretical implications are largely consistent with existing empirical evidence on business cycle-dependent government spending effects on key macroeconomic variables.
ISSN:0304-3932
1873-1295
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.04.006