Loading…

CdS/CdSe quantum dots co-sensitized solar cells with Cu2S counter electrode prepared by SILAR, spray pyrolysis and Zn–Cu alloy methods

•Preparation of CdS/CdSe co-sensitized TiO2 photoanodes for QDSSCs.•Employing alloy, SILAR and spray pyrolysis methods.•Various conversion efficiencies measured equal to 3.18, 0.341 and 0.266%.•The sizes of CdS and CdSe QDs were obtained about 5 and 6nm.•The band gaps vary from 3.1eV to 2.38eV (TiO2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. A, Chemistry. Chemistry., 2013-11, Vol.271, p.56-64
Main Authors: Salaramoli, Hosein, Maleki, Elham, Shariatinia, Zahra, Ranjbar, Maryam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Preparation of CdS/CdSe co-sensitized TiO2 photoanodes for QDSSCs.•Employing alloy, SILAR and spray pyrolysis methods.•Various conversion efficiencies measured equal to 3.18, 0.341 and 0.266%.•The sizes of CdS and CdSe QDs were obtained about 5 and 6nm.•The band gaps vary from 3.1eV to 2.38eV (TiO2/CdS (3)/CdSe). Herein, CdS/CdSe co-sensitized TiO2 photoanodes for QDSSCs were prepared by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR), spray pyrolysis and zinc–copper alloy processes. The HR-TEM, SEM, EDS, XRD, UV–vis and I–V curve analyses were performed to investigate the surface and structural properties of the prepared electrodes and the efficiencies of the fabricated QDSSs. Employing different methods for preparation of Cu2S counter electrode affected the performance of QDSSCs under one illumination of sun (100mW/cm2) so that various conversion efficiencies (μ) of 3.18, 0.341 and 0.266% were measured in alloy, SILAR and spray pyrolysis methods, respectively. Therefore, among these methods, the zinc–copper alloy process with higher efficiency is preferred that gives fill factor (ff) and short circuit density (JSC) values of 0.44 and 11.69mA/cm2. The HR-TEM images showed that CdS and CdSe QDs are in close contact with TiO2 nanoparticles and the sizes of CdS and CdSe QDs are about 5 and 6nm, respectively. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurement confirmed that CdS and CdSe QDs are successfully deposited on the surface of the TiO2 film. The band gaps estimated from Tauc plots using UV–vis spectra vary from 3.1eV (without CdS and CdSe, bare TiO2) to 2.38eV (TiO2/CdS (3)/CdSe). The SEM images of Cu2S counter electrodes prepared by zinc–copper alloy indicated nanosheets with high porosity that is much suitable for injection of electrolyte while in two other approaches (SILAR and spray pyrolysis), large (∼50–70nm) and small (∼10–17nm) nanoparticles were observed without high porosity.
ISSN:1010-6030
1873-2666
DOI:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.08.006