Evaluation of EPIC oxygen bands stability with radiative transfer simulations over the South Pole

• Published in: Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer 2023-12, Vol.310, p.108737, Article 108737
• Main Authors: Zhou, Yaping, Zhai, Peng-Wang, Yang, Yuekui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Calibration; DSCOVR; Earth Resources and Remote Sensing; EPIC; Geosciences (General); Radiative transfer model simulation; Remote sensing; South Pole
• ISSN: 0022-4073; 1879-1352
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2023.108737

•The EPIC instrument lacks onboard calibration and the indirect moon-view calibration for its oxygen bands is subject to large uncertainties.•Large discrepancies between the model simulations and EPIC measurements over South Pole indicate possible low bias in EPIC absolute calibration.•Multi-year trends in oxygen band ratios can be accounted by orbit shifting which means the instrument is stable over the past 7 years. The Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) onboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite orbiting the Sun at the Lagrange-1 point was launched without onboard calibration systems. Vicarious calibration is conducted for 8 of the 10 UV/VIS/NIR channels using other low earth orbiting satellite instruments, while its two O2 bands (688 nm and 764 nm) rely on indirect moon-view calibrations because the same narrow-band O2 bands are not readily available from other in-flight instruments. This study compares EPIC measurements from the four O2 bands aiming at examining sensor stability over a uniquely suited location, i.e., the permanently snow-covered South Pole. The study utilizes radiative transfer model simulations with in-situ atmospheric soundings taken at South Pole during months of December and January from 2015 to 2022. The absolute discrepancy between the model simulations and observations is less than 1.0% for the two reference bands, but 5.75% and 15.63% for the 688 nm, and 764 nm absorption bands, respectively. The simulated A-band and B-band ratios are 16.09% and 4.74% higher than that from the observations. Various sensitivities are conducted to estimate possible contributions to the discrepancies from input atmospheric profiles, spectral surface albedos and surface BRDF. While none of the input uncertainties is likely to account for the large discrepancies in the oxygen absorption bands, a small shift in the instrument response function could be the main reason for these biases. On the other hand, the model simulations are able to capture systematic variations with observed angular measurements and explain the multi-year trends found in observed O2 band ratios due to satellite orbit shifting. When model simulated contributions from the angle variations are deducted from the observed O2 band ratios, the residual O2 band ratios are found to be stable since 2015.