Loading…

Analysis of Mars Exploration Rover wheel mobility processes and the limitations of classical terramechanics models using discrete element method simulations

•Physical processes of Mars Exploration Rover (MER) wheel mobility are described.•Tailings piles build behind a MER wheel during high wheel slip conditions.•ARTEMIS mobility model terramechanics equations don’t account for tailings piles.•MER discrete element method (DEM) model accurately predict ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of terramechanics 2017-10, Vol.73, p.61-71
Main Authors: Johnson, Jerome B., Duvoy, Paul X., Kulchitsky, Anton V., Creager, Colin, Moore, Jeffery
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Physical processes of Mars Exploration Rover (MER) wheel mobility are described.•Tailings piles build behind a MER wheel during high wheel slip conditions.•ARTEMIS mobility model terramechanics equations don’t account for tailings piles.•MER discrete element method (DEM) model accurately predict tailings pile formation.•A wheel mobility lookup table from DEM simulations will improve ARTEMIS accuracy. A previous three-dimensional discrete element method (DEM) model of Mars Exploration Rovers (MERs) wheel mobility demonstrated agreement with test data for wheel drawbar pull and sinkage for wheel slips from 0.0 to 0.7. Here, results from the previous model are compared with wheel mobility data for non-MER wheels that cover the range of wheel slip from 0.0 to 1.0. Wheel slips near 1.0 are of interest for assessing rover mobility hazards. DEM MER wheel model predictions show close agreement with weight-normalized wheel drawbar pull data from 0.0 to 0.99 wheel slip and show a similar trend for wheel sinkage. The nonlinear increase in MER wheel drawbar pull and sinkage for wheel slips greater that 0.7 is caused by development of a tailings pile behind the wheel as it digs into the regolith. Classical terramechanics wheel mobility equations used in the ARTEMIS MER mobility model are inaccurate above wheel slips of 0.6 as they do not account for the regolith tailings pile behind the wheel. To improve ARTEMIS accuracy at wheel slips greater that 0.6 a lookup table of drawbar pull, wheel torque, and sinkage derived from DEM mobility simulations can be substituted for terramechanics equation calculations.
ISSN:0022-4898
1879-1204
DOI:10.1016/j.jterra.2017.09.002