Streetcar projects as spatial planning: A shift in transport planning in the United States

• Published in: Journal of transport geography 2016-06, Vol.54, p.383-390
• Main Authors: King, David A., Fischer, Lauren Ames
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Economic development; Placemaking; Spatial planning; Streetcars; Voter referendum
• ISSN: 0966-6923; 1873-1236
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.005

Currently dozens of U.S. cities are in the midst of planning and building modern streetcar systems. Though seemingly mobility investments, the intended impacts of these streetcar projects reach beyond transportation and represent a strong turn toward strategic spatial planning through transportation infrastructure. Proponents of modern streetcars argue that they are tools of placemaking as much as if not more than improvements for transit services. Unlike transit investments of a century ago, when privately operated streetcars were a decentralizing force that helped disperse overcrowded central city cores and open new land for real estate development, current streetcar projects in the United States are expected to concentrate activity and economic development in select corridors. The majority of these new systems rely on transit technologies that are significantly improved over the carriages of old, with modern features, smooth rides and quiet operations. Yet for all the improvements to the vehicles and services, new streetcar investments no longer primarily improve transit accessibility. Rather, modern streetcars are part of strategic amenity packages cities use to achieve real estate and economic development goals. This use of transportation infrastructure as an amenity for a particular location is a shift away from traditional transportation planning processes, and the expected benefits, in particular, stand apart as being deliberately spatial. We use planning documents and data from ballot box initiatives to evaluate expected transportation benefits relative to indirect benefits through economic development. We find that approximately three-quarters of all expected benefits from streetcar projects accrue to property development with the remaining expected benefits assigned to transportation. However, we do not find sufficient empirical evidence in the literature to support such certain claims of positive effects on property values and the built environment. We argue that the increasing tendency of cities to leverage streetcar projects for non-transportation purposes represents a turn to the use of infrastructure as a tool of spatial planning. •Modern streetcar projects in the United States represent a turn toward strategic spatial planning.•Most new streetcar projects are designed to promote local economic development over transportation benefits.•New streetcar projects are often not developed as part of a regional transit planning strategy.