Multi-timescale attention residual shrinkage network with adaptive global-local denoising for rolling-bearing fault diagnosis

• Published in: Knowledge-based systems 2024-11, Vol.304, p.112478, Article 112478
• Main Authors: Gao, Huihui, Zhang, Xiaoran, Gao, Xuejin, Li, Fangyu, Han, Honggui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptive soft thresholding function; Attention mechanism; Global-local noise elimination; Multi-timescale feature extraction; Rolling-bearing fault diagnosis
• ISSN: 0950-7051
• DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112478

In actual engineering scenarios, bearing fault signals are inevitably overwhelmed by strong background noise from various sources. However, most deep-learning-based diagnostic models tend to broaden the feature extraction scale to extract rich fault features for bearing-fault identification under noise interference, with little attention paid to multi-timescale discriminative feature mining with adaptive noise rejection, which affects the diagnostic performance. Thus, a multi-timescale attention residual shrinkage network with adaptive global-local denoising (AMARSN) was proposed for rolling-bearing fault diagnosis by learning discriminative multi-timescale fault features from signals and fully eliminating noise components in the multi-timescale fault features. First, a multi-timescale attention learning module (MALMod) was developed to capture multi-timescale fault features and enhance their discriminability under noise interference. Subsequently, an adaptive global-local denoising module (AGDMod) was constructed to fully eliminate noise in multiscale fault features by constructing specific global-local denoising thresholds and designing an adaptive smooth soft thresholding function. Finally, end-to-end bearing fault diagnosis tasks were realized using a softmax classifier located at the end of the AMARSN. The AMARSN was validated using two bearing datasets. The extensive results demonstrated that the AMARSN can mine more effective fault features from signals and achieve average diagnostic accuracies of 85.24% and 80.09% under different noise with different levels.