Loading…

Bevacizumab combined with pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by maintenance bevacizumab/pemetrexed as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A single-arm Phase 2 study

Abstract Objectives First-line pemetrexed-cisplatin (Pem-Cis) induction therapy followed by Pem maintenance, and first-line bevacizumab- (Bev-) based therapy are treatment options for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This study explored efficacy and safety of first-line induction Pem-Cis +...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-10, Vol.86 (1), p.47-53
Main Authors: Santoro, Armando, Hillerdal, Gunnar N, Hoeffken, Gert, Favaretto, Adolfo, Carrion, Ramon Perez, Visseren-Grul, Carla, Ameryckx, Sophie, Helsberg, Karin, Soldatenkova, Victoria, Bourayou, Nawel, Sørensen, Jens B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives First-line pemetrexed-cisplatin (Pem-Cis) induction therapy followed by Pem maintenance, and first-line bevacizumab- (Bev-) based therapy are treatment options for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. This study explored efficacy and safety of first-line induction Pem-Cis + Bev followed by maintenance Pem + Bev. Materials and methods Patients with ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1 were scheduled to receive four cycles Pem 500 mg/m2 , Cis 75 mg/m2 , and Bev 7.5 mg/kg, given every 21 days. In absence of progressive disease (PD) and if ECOG-PS ≤1, patients could continue Pem + Bev maintenance until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All patients received vitamin supplementation as per Pem label. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. Results 109 patients received induction therapy (median age 61 yrs, ECOG-PS 0/1 54/46%, stage IIIB/IV 9/91%, adenocarcinoma 91%), 72 patients (66.1%) started maintenance therapy. Median (maximum) numbers of cycles were 4 (4) for Cis and 8 (34) for Pem + Bev. Overall, median PFS and OS were 6.9 (90%CI 5.7–8.3) and 14.7 (95%CI 11.5–19.7) months. For patients starting maintenance therapy, median (95%CI) PFS and OS were 9.4 (7.2–11.5) and 19.7 (14.9–25.9) months. Overall response and disease control rates were 42.2% and 67.9%, respectively. Two patients died from study-treatment related toxicity (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, aspiration pneumonia; both during induction therapy). Most common G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25.7%) and fatigue (14.7%); hypertension was less common (5.5%). Conclusion Patients with advanced NS-NSCLC eligible for Bev-treatment may derive clinical benefit at acceptable toxicity from the addition of Bev to both Pem-Cis induction and Pem maintenance therapy; however, this is not an approved combination regimen.
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.003