Loading…

Flotation of monazite in the presence of calcite part II: Enhanced separation performance using sodium silicate and EDTA

•Sodium silicate and SHMP selectively depressed calcite in single mineral tests.•Monazite floatability was suppressed by the depressants in a mixed system.•Suppression was due to co-adsorption of depressants and calcium species.•Citric acid and EDTA efficiently removed calcium ions from monazite sur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Minerals engineering 2018-10, Vol.127, p.318-328
Main Authors: Zhang, Wencai, Honaker, Rick Q.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Sodium silicate and SHMP selectively depressed calcite in single mineral tests.•Monazite floatability was suppressed by the depressants in a mixed system.•Suppression was due to co-adsorption of depressants and calcium species.•Citric acid and EDTA efficiently removed calcium ions from monazite surfaces.•CaCO3(aq) and CaHCO3− interact with Si(OH)4 and SiO(OH)3− on monazite surfaces. Selective depression of calcite in a monazite-calcite flotation system was systematically studied using micro-flotation and electrokinetic tests as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization and solution chemistry calculations. Monazite was found to be depressed by both sodium silicate and sodium hexametaphosphate when calcium ions appeared in solution. It was hypothesized that co-adsorption of calcium species (CaHCO3+ and CaCO3(aq)) and Si(OH)4 as well as SiO(OH)3- via hydrogen bonding formed a compact layer over the monazite surface, thereby reducing octanohydroxamic acid adsorption by steric hindrance. The use of citric acid or EDTA formed soluble chelates (e.g. CaCit− and CaEdta2−) with the calcium ions which negated the flotation suppression effect. An XPS study indicated that both EDTA and citric acid chemically adsorbed on the monazite surface, while the adsorption on the calcite surface was achieved mainly through hydrogen bonding. EDTA was more effective than citric acid due to two reasons: (i) citric acid itself presented stronger depression effects and (ii) citric acid has weaker chelating properties for calcium. Using 2.5 × 10−4 M octanohydroxamic acid, 0.05 g/L sodium silicate and 6 × 10−5 M EDTA, monazite recovery of more than 90% was achieved while recovering only 20% of the calcite.
ISSN:0892-6875
1872-9444
DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.042