Loading…
Two novel enantiomers from metarhizium flavoviride and their inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase
•Two novel enantiomers were obtained from metarhizium flavoviride and named metarrhiziumoids a and b.•Both metarrhiziumoids a and b have α-glycosidase inhibitory activity, and the activity of metarrhiziumoids b is stronger than that of metarrhiziumoids a.•Molecular docking results show that the two...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of molecular structure 2022-09, Vol.1264, p.133322, Article 133322 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Two novel enantiomers were obtained from metarhizium flavoviride and named metarrhiziumoids a and b.•Both metarrhiziumoids a and b have α-glycosidase inhibitory activity, and the activity of metarrhiziumoids b is stronger than that of metarrhiziumoids a.•Molecular docking results show that the two enantiomers have different optimal docking modes and the binding energy for the metarrhiziumoids b was lower than that for metarrhiziumoids a.
A pair of novel enantiomers metarrhiziumoids A (R-enantiomer, 14.3 mg) and B (S-enantiomer, 9.5 mg) were isolated from 3.0 g extract of Metarhizium flavoviride by silica gel column chromatography combined with preparative and semi-preparative HPLC, and identified with high resolution mass, 1D, 2D NMR and circular dichroism. Targets prediction showed that the two compounds had glycosidase inhibitory activity. Result of α-glycosidase inhibitory tests showed that the both enantiomers were competitive inhibitors of α-glycosidase, and the bioactivity of metarrhiziumoids B (IC50 = 174 μg/mL) was stronger than that of metarrhiziumoids A (IC50 = 259 μg/mL). Molecular docking results show that the two enantiomers have different optimal docking modes and the binding energy for the S-enantiomer (-7.8 kcal/mol) was lower than for the R-enantiomer (-7.20 kcal/mol). The docking mode selections and binding energy differences resulted in the inhibitory activity difference.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-2860 1872-8014 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133322 |