Loading…

Optimizing machine learning techniques and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis for the compressive property of self-compacting concrete

This study examined the effectiveness of employing machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate the compressive strength (CS) of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Multiple techniques were utilized, such as a decision tree (DT), a random forest regressor (RFR), an AdaBoost regressor (AR), and a gradien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials today communications 2024-06, Vol.39, p.108804, Article 108804
Main Authors: Wang, Zhiyuan, Liu, Huihui, Amin, Muhammad Nasir, Khan, Kaffayatullah, Qadir, Muhammad Tahir, Khan, Suleman Ayub
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the effectiveness of employing machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate the compressive strength (CS) of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Multiple techniques were utilized, such as a decision tree (DT), a random forest regressor (RFR), an AdaBoost regressor (AR), and a gradient boosting regressor (GBR). Additionally, the research investigated the impacts and correlations among input variables and the CS of SCC using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique. A full dataset was created, including a single dependent variable and ten independents. Although GBR and DT methods proved effective, the research indicated that AR and RFR provided the most accurate predictions of SCC's CS. The AR and RFR models demonstrated superior performance compared to the DT and GBR models, as evident by their R2 values of 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, outperforming the DT and GBR models with R2 values of 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. The SHAP investigation revealed that the concentration of superplasticizer and cement in the mixture had an extensive impact on the CS of SCC. The findings of this study indicate that both AR and RFR methods had comparable predictive abilities in estimating SCC's CS. [Display omitted]
ISSN:2352-4928
2352-4928
DOI:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108804