Loading…

Determining the dynamic draught for precise hydrographic surveying

In hydrographic surveying, high precision is needed for engineering applications such as the construction of tube tunnels placed to seabed and the navigational safety of ships for the under keel clearance (UKC) in shallow canals or waterways. Minimum measurement standards for hydrographic surveying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean engineering 2013-04, Vol.62, p.38-44
Main Authors: Aykut, Nedim Onur, Akpınar, Burak
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In hydrographic surveying, high precision is needed for engineering applications such as the construction of tube tunnels placed to seabed and the navigational safety of ships for the under keel clearance (UKC) in shallow canals or waterways. Minimum measurement standards for hydrographic surveying are created by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) for safety of navigation. As well as IHO, the Swedish Maritime Administration (SMA), Land Information New Zealand (LINZ), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) standards are used in surveys. At 40-m depth, the depth error budget must be less than 40cm, according to IHO standards. Allowable maximum error is only 22cm in SMA hydrographic survey standards. These standards can be achieved by minimizing the error sources. One of the errors in hydrographic surveying is the determination of the transducer draught. Usually a static draught is used in hydrographic surveying. In this paper, the dynamic draught of a survey vessel is determined using the RTK GNSS method for different speeds. Differences between the static and dynamic draught values are analyzed for precise hydrographic surveying. It is determined that the dynamic draught of the vessel should be used for achieving the international standards in precise surveying projects. ► We determined the dynamic draught of the survey vessel using RTK GNSS method. ► We determined the dynamic draught for different vessel speeds. ► We analyzed the differences between the static and dynamic draught values. ► We compare the results with international surveying standards.
ISSN:0029-8018
1873-5258
DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.01.024