Loading…
The change in salience and the cross-section of stock returns: Empirical evidence from China A-shares
This study explores the relationship between stocks' change in salience (CS) and the cross-section of stock returns. We find that the change in salience can negatively predict future stock returns. Investors, attracted by salient attributes of choices, overestimate prominent rising trends in st...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pacific-Basin finance journal 2024-06, Vol.85, p.102319, Article 102319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study explores the relationship between stocks' change in salience (CS) and the cross-section of stock returns. We find that the change in salience can negatively predict future stock returns. Investors, attracted by salient attributes of choices, overestimate prominent rising trends in stock historical return performance and extrapolate, leading stocks with prominent rising trends to be overpriced and earning lower subsequent returns. In terms of potential mechanisms, we find that costly arbitrage and lottery preference are two underlying mechanisms behind the mispricing of CS. The CS effect is more pronounced among stocks with greater costly arbitrage and greater lottery preference. Moreover, both institutional and individual investors are shown to generate distortions of expectations induced by salient thinking. Our findings are robust after considering common risk factors, shell contamination, short-term reversals, the prospect theory, and investor attention.
•We investigate the stock return predictability of stocks' change in salience (CS) in the cross section.•We find that CS can significantly and negatively predict future stock returns.•The CS effect is more pronounced among stocks with greater costly arbitrage and greater lottery preference.•Both institutional and individual investors are shown to generate distortions of expectations induced by salient thinking.•Our results are consistent with behavioral mispricing explanations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0927-538X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102319 |