Attachment and well-being: The mediating role of emotion regulation and resilience

• Published in: Personality and individual differences 2012-11, Vol.53 (7), p.821-826
• Main Authors: Karreman, Annemiek, Vingerhoets, Ad J.J.M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Affectivity. Emotion; Attachment styles; Biological and medical sciences; Emotion regulation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Personality. Affectivity; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Reappraisal; Resilience; Suppression; Well-being
• ISSN: 0191-8869; 1873-3549
• DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.014

► Offers insight into associations between attachment styles and well-being. ► Secure and dismissing attachment styles were associated with higher well-being. ► Preoccupied attachment was related to lower well-being. ► Mediating effects were found of reappraisal and resilience. ► Suppression failed to function as a mediator between attachment and well-being. The aim of this study was to obtain better insight into the associations between attachment styles and psychological well-being, by testing the possible mediating roles of emotion regulation (i.e., reappraisal and suppression) and resilience. In a community sample of 632 individuals, secure and dismissing attachment styles were found to be associated with higher well-being, while preoccupied attachment was the attachment style with the most adverse outcome. Fearful attachment was not directly related to well-being. Results of the multiple mediation model revealed unique relationships with emotion regulation and resilience for each attachment style, explaining connections with well-being. Secure attachment was associated with higher reappraisal and resilience, partly mediating the effect on well-being. Complete mediation was found for dismissing attachment via higher reappraisal and resilience, and for preoccupied attachment via lower reappraisal and resilience. Remarkably, fearful attachment had indirect positive effects on well-being through higher reappraisal and resilience. Suppression failed to function as a mediator between attachment and well-being. The findings provide suggestive evidence why individuals differ in psychological well-being as a function of attachment style.