Loading…
Cross-lingual few-shot sign language recognition
There are over 150 sign languages worldwide, each with numerous local variants and thousands of signs. However, collecting annotated data for each sign language to train a model is a laborious and expert-dependent task. To address this issue, this paper introduces the problem of few-shot sign langua...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pattern recognition 2024-07, Vol.151, p.110374, Article 110374 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | There are over 150 sign languages worldwide, each with numerous local variants and thousands of signs. However, collecting annotated data for each sign language to train a model is a laborious and expert-dependent task. To address this issue, this paper introduces the problem of few-shot sign language recognition (FSSLR) in a cross-lingual setting. The central motivation is to be able to recognize a novel sign, even if it belongs to a sign language unseen during training, based on a small set of examples. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel embedding-based framework that first extracts a spatio-temporal visual representation based on video and hand features, as well as hand landmark estimates. To establish a comprehensive test bed, we propose three meta-learning FSSLR benchmarks that span multiple languages, and extensively evaluate the proposed framework. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed approach for few-shot sign language recognition in both monolingual and cross-lingual settings.
•The motivation of the problem is to recognize a novel sign based on a small set of examples.•A novel framework leverages signer body and hand features for embedding is proposed.•Three novel meta-learning benchmarks that span multiple languages are introduced.•Our embedding framework achieves the best performance in three proposed benchmarks. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-3203 1873-5142 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110374 |