Loading…
Improved measure of workpiece surface deterioration during turning using non-contact vision method
The surface finish quality of a machined workpiece is commonly measured using the average roughness parameter, Ra. This parameter, however, is insensitive to the lateral changes undergone by the surface in the feed direction as a consequence of tool wear. In this work, the effectiveness of four meth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Precision engineering 2021-03, Vol.68, p.273-284 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The surface finish quality of a machined workpiece is commonly measured using the average roughness parameter, Ra. This parameter, however, is insensitive to the lateral changes undergone by the surface in the feed direction as a consequence of tool wear. In this work, the effectiveness of four methods of workpiece surface analysis, namely autocorrelation, cross-correlation, and two new methods, called lateral material shift (LMS) ratio and profile slope ratio (PSR) analyses are investigated. Dry machining experiments were carried out on 316 stainless steel. Images of tool nose and workpiece profiles were captured using digital camera, and the edges were extracted using sub-pixel edge detection. In the autocorrelation approach, each workpiece profile was correlated with a shifted version of the same profile. In the cross-correlation approach, the workpiece profiles at different stages of machining were correlated with a reference profile generated using the unworn tool edge. In the LMS ratio method, the material shift ratios were determined from each waveform on the workpiece profile at various stages of tool wear, while in the PSR method the slopes at the right and left part of the waveform were compared. Among the four methods, the LMS ratio method produced the best correlation with tool flank wear with the maximum R-squared value of 0.9461, while average roughness Ra showed no correlation at all with both major and nose flank wear.
•Researchers have reported lack of correlation between average roughness Ra and tool wear.•Ra is insensitive to lateral changes to workpiece surface in feed direction.•Effectiveness of autocorrelation, cross-correlation, lateral material shift and profile slope ratios are investigated.•Among the four methods, lateral material shift ratio produced highest correlation with tool flank wear.•Ra showed no correlation at all with both major and nose flank wear. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0141-6359 1873-2372 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.12.016 |