Systems Engineering and Metabolic Engineering: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Cells of living organisms simultaneously operate hundreds or thousands of interconnected chemical reactions. Metabolic networks include these chemical reactions and the compounds participating in them. Metabolic engineering is a science centered on the analysis and purposeful modification of an orga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Procedia computer science 2012, Vol.8, p.226-231
Main Authors: Johnnie, Joseph, Austin, Mark, Sriram, Ganesh, Conway, Matt, Misra, Ashish
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological Networks
Flux Balance Analysis
Metabolic engineering
SBGN
SBML
Synthetic biology
SysML
Systems Engineering
Yeast Metabolism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cells of living organisms simultaneously operate hundreds or thousands of interconnected chemical reactions. Metabolic networks include these chemical reactions and the compounds participating in them. Metabolic engineering is a science centered on the analysis and purposeful modification of an organism's metabolic network toward a beneficial purpose, such as production of fuel or medicinal compounds in microorganisms. Unfortunately, there are problems with the design and visualization of modified metabolic networks due to lack of a standardized and fully developed visual modelling languages. The purposes of this paper are to propose a multi-level framework for the synthesis, analysis and design of metabolic systems, and then explore the extent to which abstractions from systems engineering (e.g., SysML) can complement and add value to the abstractions currently under development within the greater biological community (e.g. SBGN). The computational test-bed that accompanies this work is production of the anti-malarial drug artemisinin in genetically engineered Saccaharomyces cerevisiae (yeast).
ISSN:1877-0509
1877-0509
DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.047