Loading…
From setback to comeback: Motivations for withdrawn IPO firms to return
•Second-time IPOs return to the market with the motivation to grow and expand through R&D and CAPEX.•The returning firms show significantly lower post-IPO acquisition activity compared to first-time IPOs.•R&D and CAPEX benefit the second-time IPOs in the long run in terms of stock performanc...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Quarterly review of economics and finance 2017-11, Vol.66, p.259-264 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Second-time IPOs return to the market with the motivation to grow and expand through R&D and CAPEX.•The returning firms show significantly lower post-IPO acquisition activity compared to first-time IPOs.•R&D and CAPEX benefit the second-time IPOs in the long run in terms of stock performance.
Are withdrawn IPOs that return to the market driven by the same acquisition motive as first-time IPOs? We examine the investment decisions of second-time IPO firms after successfully going public. Our findings show that, contrary to first time IPOs, second-time IPOs are not active acquirers and spend significantly more on CAPEX and R&D than first-time IPOs. Unlike acquisitions in the post-IPO period, CAPEX and R&D spending benefit second-time IPOs’ long run performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1062-9769 1878-4259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.qref.2017.03.002 |