Loading…

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation era: A single-center registry

Abstract Introduction Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been limited by the risk of complications and restenosis. However, growing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revived interest in this technique. We analyzed the current indications for BAV and outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista portuguesa de cardiologia (English ed.) 2017-04, Vol.36 (4), p.251-256
Main Authors: Francisco, Ana Rita G, Nobre Menezes, Miguel, Carrilho Ferreira, Pedro, Jorge, Cláudia, Silva, Doroteia, Infante de Oliveira, Eduardo, Pinto, Fausto J, Canas da Silva, Pedro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been limited by the risk of complications and restenosis. However, growing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revived interest in this technique. We analyzed the current indications for BAV and outcomes in a single center. Methods Acute results and long-term outcomes were analyzed in a retrospective single-center registry of patients undergoing BAV between January 2013 and January 2016. Results Twenty-three patients underwent BAV, 56.5% male, mean age 78±7 years. Indications were severe aortic stenosis and decompensated heart failure (n=5), urgent non-cardiac surgery (n=8), or bridge to definitive treatment (n=10). Peak invasive gradient decreased from a median of 54.0±19.0 mmHg to 28.5±13.8 mmHg (p=0.002). Complications included one ischemic stroke, one lower limb ischemia and one femoral pseudoaneurysm requiring surgery. During a mean follow-up of 11±10 months, eight patients underwent TAVI and two underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. Thirteen patients died, nine of non-cardiovascular causes. On Kaplan-Meier analysis mortality was significantly lower among patients undergoing definitive treatment (20.0% vs. 84.6% at two-year follow-up; p=0.005). Conclusion BAV should be considered for selected patients with temporary contraindications to definitive therapy or as palliative therapy.
ISSN:2174-2049
2174-2049
DOI:10.1016/j.repce.2016.09.010