Impact on long-term cardiovascular outcomes of different cardiac resynchronization therapy response criteria

• Published in: Revista portuguesa de cardiologia (English ed.) 2018-12, Vol.37 (12), p.961-969
• Main Authors: Rodrigues, Inês, Abreu, Ana, Oliveira, Mário, Cunha, Pedro S, Clara, Helena Santa, Osório, Paulo, Lousinha, Ana, Valente, Bruno, Portugal, Guilherme, Rio, Pedro, Morais, Luís A, Santos, Vanessa, Carmo, Miguel M, Ferreira, Rui C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Cardiovascular; Critérios de resposta; Heart failure; Insuficiência cardíaca; Predictors of events; Preditores de eventos; Response criteria; Terapia de ressincronização cardíaca
• ISSN: 2174-2049; 2174-2049
• DOI: 10.1016/j.repce.2018.02.021

Abstract Introduction There is a lack of consensus on the definition of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and it is not clear which response criteria have most influence on cardiac event-free survival. Objectives To assess the predictive value of various response criteria in patients undergoing CRT and the agreement between them. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of the BETTER-HF trial. Patient response was classified at six months after CRT according to eleven criteria used in previous trials. The predictive value of response criteria for survival free from mortality, cardiac transplantation and heart failure hospitalization was assessed by Cox regression analysis. Agreement between the different response criteria was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ). Results A total of 115 patients were followed for a mean of 25 months. During follow-up, 15 deaths occurred (13%) and 29 patients had at least one adverse cardiac event (25%). Only five of the eleven response criteria were predictors of event-free survival. The most powerful isolated clinical and echocardiographic predictors were a reduction of ≥1 NYHA functional class (HR 0.39 for responders; 95% CI 0.18-0.83, p=0.014) and an increase of at least 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90, p=0.024), respectively. Agreement between the different response criteria was poor. Conclusions Most currently used response criteria do not predict clinical outcomes and have poor agreement. It is essential to establish a consensus on the definition of CRT response in order to standardize studies.