Estimating crop coefficients and water use of a full-bearing mango orchard in north-eastern South Africa using the fraction of vegetation cover and a dual source evapotranspiration model

• Published in: Scientia horticulturae 2024-10, Vol.336, p.113388, Article 113388
• Main Authors: GP, Nel, Dangare, P., Kleinert, A., Dzikiti, S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Shuttleworth & Wallace model; Soil evaporation; Soil water content; Transpiration
• ISSN: 0304-4238; 1879-1018
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113388

•Mango orchard water use can be accurately estimated using the FAO 56 approach.•Accurate Kcs for mango orchards can be obtained from fractional cover and tree height.•The FAO method gave superior estimates of orchard ETc than the dual source model. In semi-arid countries like South Africa, commercially produced mango (Mangifera Indica L.) are grown entirely under irrigation. However, there is little accurate quantitative information on the water use of mango orchards, and few accurate water use models currently exist. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the FAO 56 method of estimating crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and a dual source water use model against measurements of actual consumptive water use of a commercial mango orchard. The FAO approach calculates ETc as the product of a crop coefficient (Kc) and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). We derived Kc for well-watered orchards from readily available data including the fraction of vegetation cover, average tree height, and a stomatal control coefficient. The dual-source model calculated orchard evapotranspiration as the sum of tree transpiration and orchard floor evaporation derived from the modified Shuttleworth and Wallace model. Actual evapotranspiration was measured using an open path eddy covariance system, while tree transpiration was measured using the heat ratio method of monitoring sap flow. Data were collected in a mature ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango orchard grown with micro-sprinkler irrigation in north-eastern South Africa. Results show that the reference evapotranspiration explained most of the variation in orchard transpiration (R2 ∼ 0.78) compared to the solar radiation (R2 ∼ 0.66) and the vapour pressure deficit of the air (R2 ∼ 0.66). Compared with field measured water use data, the FAO method gave relatively accurate estimates of transpiration (R2 = 0.74, NRMSE = ±18.00 %, NMAE = ±15.00 %, NSE = 0.70) and evapotranspiration (R2 = 0.58, NRMSE = ±19.00 %, NMAE = ±16.00 %, NSE = 0.55). NSE is the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency. The dual-source model yielded slightly less accurate estimates of transpiration (R2 = 0.61, NRMSE = ±22.00 %, NMAE = ±20.00 %, NSE = 0.39) and evapotranspiration (R2 = 0.52, NRMSE = ±23.00 %, NMAE = ±25.00 %, NSE = 0.51). The basal crop coefficient (Kcb) showed small seasonal fluctuations, varying between 0.40 and 0.60 throughout the year. In contrast, Kc showed clear seasonality varying between 0.59–0.64 at flowering and fruit set and rising to 0.81–0.90 during