Toxicity assessment within the application of in situ contaminated sediment remediation technologies: A review

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2018-04, Vol.621, p.85-94
• Main Authors: Libralato, Giovanni, Minetto, Diego, Lofrano, Giusy, Guida, Marco, Carotenuto, Maurizio, Aliberti, Francesco, Conte, Barbara, Notarnicola, Michele
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activated carbon; Amendment; Capping; In situ remediation; Sediment; Toxicity
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.229

Polluted sediment represents a great problem for aquantic environments with potential direct acute and chronic effects for the biota and can be tackled with both in situ and ex situ treatments. Once dredging activities are not compulsory, sediment can be kept in place and managed with techniques involving the use of amendment and/or capping. Before their application, the assessment of their potential impact to the target environment cannot ignore the safe-by-design approach. The role of toxicity in in situ sediment remediation was reviewed discussing about how it can be used for the selection of amendments and the monitoring of treatment technologies. Results evidenced that capping technology coupled to activated carbon (AC) is the most frequently applied approach with effects varying according to the rate of contamination in treated sediment, the amount of AC used (% v/v), and target biological models considered. Little data are available for zerovalent iron as well as other minor amending agents such as hematite, natural zeolite, biopolymers and organoclays. Current (eco-)toxicological information for in situ sediment remediation technologies is fragmentary and incomplete or entirely missing, making also the interpretation of existing data quite challenging. In situ sediment remediation represents an interesting potentially effective approach for polluted sediment recovering. As its application in some lab-based and field studies reported to induce negative effects for target organisms, amendments and capping agents must be attentively evaluated for short- and long-term environmental effects, also in the perspective of the remediated site monitoring and maintenance. [Display omitted] •Sediment as sink/source of pollution represents a great deal for aquatic ecosystems.•In situ technologies are a chance for remediation but with unknown long-term effect.•Reviewed toxicity data are fragmentary, incomplete or entirely missing.•Activated carbon is a frequent amendment, but with potential undesired effects.•Long-term toxicity data are necessary for remediated sites monitoring/maintenance.