Loading…

Evaluation of low-cost sensors for quantitative personal exposure monitoring

[Display omitted] •Challenges associated with the robustness of low-cost sensors are studied.•Field experiments are performed to analyse sensor performance in diverse conditions.•Pre/post deployment colocation experiments are performed for LCS and reference monitors.•We investigated four calibration...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainable cities and society 2020-06, Vol.57, p.102076, Article 102076
Main Authors: Mahajan, Sachit, Kumar, Prashant
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Challenges associated with the robustness of low-cost sensors are studied.•Field experiments are performed to analyse sensor performance in diverse conditions.•Pre/post deployment colocation experiments are performed for LCS and reference monitors.•We investigated four calibration methods for SC kits: LR, ANN, SVR and RF.•SVR model outperformed others models with an average RMSE of 3.39 for PM2.5 and 4.10 for PM10. Observation of air pollution at high spatio-temporal resolution has become easy with the emergence of low-cost sensors (LCS). LCS provide new opportunities to enhance existing air quality monitoring frameworks but there are always questions asked about the data accuracy and quality. In this study, we assess the performance of LCS against industry-grade instruments. We use linear regression (LR), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF) regression for development of calibration models for LCS, which were Smart Citizen (SC) kits developed in iSCAPE project. Initially, outdoor colocation experiments are conducted where ten SC kits are collocated with GRIMM, which is an industry-grade instrument. Quality check on the LCS data is performed and the data is used to develop calibration models. Model evaluation is done by testing them on 9 SC kits. We observed that the SVR model outperformed other three models for PM2.5 with an average root mean square error of 3.39 and average R2 of 0.87. Model validation is performed by testing it for PM10 and SVR model shows similar results. The results indicate that SVR can be considered as a promising approach for LCS calibration.
ISSN:2210-6707
2210-6715
DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102076