Loading…

Temporal and spatial evolution of soil surface roughness on stony plots

•Soil surface roughness increased as rainfall progressed.•Steeper slope developed greater surface roughness.•LiDAR points were directly used without generating DEMs.•Multiple roughness indexes were calculated and compared.•A new method was developed for analyzing surface multiple fractals. Soil surf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil & tillage research 2020-06, Vol.200, p.104526, Article 104526
Main Authors: Li, Li, Nearing, Mark A., Nichols, Mary H., Polyakov, Viktor O., Larrabee Winter, C., Cavanaugh, Michelle L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Soil surface roughness increased as rainfall progressed.•Steeper slope developed greater surface roughness.•LiDAR points were directly used without generating DEMs.•Multiple roughness indexes were calculated and compared.•A new method was developed for analyzing surface multiple fractals. Soil surface roughness (SSR) is widely recognized as an important factor influencing water erosion processes. On semiarid hillslopes with stony soils, rock fragments accumulate as the result of preferential erosion of fine materials, often creating a rough, rocky surface. A series of rainfall events were simulated on a stony plot (2 × 6.1 m) at three slope gradients (5 %, 12 %, and 20 %) and rock cover was measured. Surface elevations were sampled by terrestrial LiDAR at high resolutions. Roughness indices, including random roughness (RR), fractal dimension, crossover length, and generalized fractal dimension, were calculated from LiDAR points directly. Results showed: 1) SSR displayed an increasing trend as the rainfall simulation proceeded for all three slope treatments; 2) the steeper slope developed greater surface roughness; and 3) both the increase of surficial exposed rocks and the formation of erosional features, e.g., rills and depressions, contributed to the spatiotemporal variations of SSR. Results also showed that the fractal dimension was not a good indicator of soil surface roughness, but rather was an index of the form of the surface. Crossover length was a measure of roughness at a scale of a few millimeters, while random roughness was a measure of elevation variations on the scale of the length of the transect measured, and thus encompassed larger morphological features including rills. We also established a new method for multifractal analysis that characterized the heterogeneity of soil surface roughness. These results improve our understanding of the evolution of semiarid stony hillslopes and the dynamic feedback mechanism between erosion, surface morphology and hydraulics.
ISSN:0167-1987
1879-3444
DOI:10.1016/j.still.2019.104526