Loading…
We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice
•The Formative Assessment Cycle can help to describe formative assessment practice.•Teachers and students have congruent perceptions of formative assessment practice.•Teachers mostly clarify expectations and elicit responses in formative assessment.•Teachers hardly use formative assessment to adjust...
Saved in:
Published in: | Studies in educational evaluation 2021-09, Vol.70, p.101027, Article 101027 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •The Formative Assessment Cycle can help to describe formative assessment practice.•Teachers and students have congruent perceptions of formative assessment practice.•Teachers mostly clarify expectations and elicit responses in formative assessment.•Teachers hardly use formative assessment to adjust teaching and learning.•Schools’ formative assessment implementation approach effects classroom practice.
This study examines teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment (FA) activities used by teachers in the classroom. These activities are divided into five phases that together comprise the FA cycle: (1) clarifying expectations, (2) eliciting responses, (3) analysing and interpreting responses, (4) communicating about responses and (5) adjusting teaching and learning. Reliable questionnaires were used to measure the perceptions of 96 teachers and 1,095 students with regard to FA practice. Paired t-tests indicated no differences between the perceptions of teachers and students, except for with regard to clarifying expectations. Teachers used FA activities primarily to clarify expectations and elicit student responses, and they were least likely to apply them to adjust teaching and learning. The results suggest that the framework of the FA cycle could be used as an analytical lens for the reliable evaluation of the FA activities of teachers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-491X 1879-2529 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027 |