Loading…

Complexity of pattern classes and the Lipschitz property

Rademacher and Gaussian complexities are successfully used in learning theory for measuring the capacity of the class of functions to be learnt. One of the most important properties for these complexities is their Lipschitz property: a composition of a class of functions with a fixed Lipschitz funct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoretical computer science 2007-09, Vol.382 (3), p.232-246
Main Authors: Ambroladze, Amiran, Parrado-Hernández, Emilio, Shawe-Taylor, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rademacher and Gaussian complexities are successfully used in learning theory for measuring the capacity of the class of functions to be learnt. One of the most important properties for these complexities is their Lipschitz property: a composition of a class of functions with a fixed Lipschitz function may increase its complexity by at most twice the Lipschitz constant. The proof of this property is non-trivial (in contrast to the case for the other properties) and it is believed that the proof in the Gaussian case is conceptually more difficult than the one for the Rademacher case. In this paper we give a detailed proof of the Lipschitz property for the general case of a symmetric complexity measure that includes the Rademacher and Gaussian complexities as special cases. We also consider the Rademacher complexity of a function class consisting of all the Lipschitz functions with a given Lipschitz constant. We show that the complexity of the class is surprisingly low in the one-dimensional case. Finally, we introduce a relaxation of the definition of Rademacher complexity to Rademacher Free Complexity and show that not only can this complexity replace the standard definition in the key theorem, but also the bounds for composed function classes are tighter.
ISSN:0304-3975
1879-2294
DOI:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.03.047