Loading…

C–H functionalisation through carbene and fluorocarbene insertion—ab initio and DFT investigations

The insertion reactions of singlet methylene and fluorocarbenes ( 1CH2, 1CHF and 1CF2) into 1°, 2° and 3° non-polar C–H bonds of alkanes (methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, n-pentane and iso-pentane) have been investigated at ab initio(MP2) and DFT levels invoking 6-31g(d,p) basis set....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of molecular structure. Theochem 2005-11, Vol.755 (1), p.169-178
Main Authors: Ramalingam, M., Ramasami, K., Venuvanalingam, P., Sethuraman, V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The insertion reactions of singlet methylene and fluorocarbenes ( 1CH2, 1CHF and 1CF2) into 1°, 2° and 3° non-polar C–H bonds of alkanes (methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane, n-pentane and iso-pentane) have been investigated at ab initio(MP2) and DFT levels invoking 6-31g(d,p) basis set. Additionally, the 6-311++g (d, p) basis set has been used for DFT calculations only. The transition states formed during the σ and π insertions of fluorocarbenes into the alkane C–H have been investigated in this study. Transition states of σ approach in the potential energy surface have been located by complete optimization while those of π approach have been subjected to constrained relaxations. Both MP2 and DFT predict that the σ approach is slightly favored over the π approach. Wide variations in the barrier heights (∼2 to ∼10 kcal/mol for 1CHF and ∼27 to ∼40 kcal/mol for 1CF 2 at MP2; ∼1 to ∼7 kcal/mol for 1CHF and ∼26 to ∼35 kcal/mol at B3LYP) have been observed for the insertions of fluorocarbenes investigated. For inverted σ approach of 1CHF and 1CF 2, the barrier heights have been found to be ca. 2–5 times that of normal σ approach. In all these insertion reactions, the singlet–triplet energy gaps correlate positively with the barrier heights while neither HOMO/LUMO energies nor HOMO–LUMO energy gaps (HLEG) correlate.
ISSN:0166-1280
1872-7999
DOI:10.1016/j.theochem.2005.08.018