Loading…

Dynamic analysis of HVAC for industrial plants with different airflow control systems

•Predictive software packages for dynamic analyses of HVAC systems are developed.•Two control systems with adjustable airflow/microclimate inlet temperature are used.•AC_AIT gives lower consumptions in terms of both hot water and electrical power.•By increasing airflow with AC_AIT, inlet conditions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thermal science and engineering progress 2018-06, Vol.6, p.330-345
Main Authors: Genco, Angela, Viggiano, Annarita, Viscido, Lucio, Sellitto, Giuseppe, Magi, Vinicio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Predictive software packages for dynamic analyses of HVAC systems are developed.•Two control systems with adjustable airflow/microclimate inlet temperature are used.•AC_AIT gives lower consumptions in terms of both hot water and electrical power.•By increasing airflow with AC_AIT, inlet conditions are closer to comfort.•AC_AAR guarantees comfort conditions for the whole microclimate. The aim of the present work is the analysis and optimization of HVAC control systems for environments under controlled thermo-hygrometric conditions in order to minimize energy consumption costs. A predictive mathematical model for the analysis of such systems has been validated in order to study the thermodynamics of conditioning processes for controlled microclimates. The model provides the hourly energy performance of an HVAC system by considering outside weather conditions. Based on such a simulation model, two different control systems have been implemented. Specifically, the first system is based on an adjustable airflow rate, whereas the second one on an adjustable inlet temperature of the controlled environment with a user-defined airflow rate profile. Both models estimate the energy consumption in terms of heating/cooling, humidification/dehumidification energy, reheat (when such process occurs) and electrical power demand due to fans and extractors. The results obtained with the two models have been compared under several climatic and set-point (comfort) conditions, thus assessing that the second control system with a minimum value of the airflow rate is the most efficient choice in terms of hot water and electrical power consumption. On the other hand, the adjustable airflow rate control system guarantees the comfort conditions for the whole microclimate.
ISSN:2451-9049
2451-9049
DOI:10.1016/j.tsep.2017.12.004