Loading…

High-strength steel deep H-shaped and box columns under proposed near-fault and post-earthquake loadings

This paper presents the seismic evaluation of high-strength steel first-story columns in a seven-story dual system, composed of a special moment-resisting frame (SMRF) and buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF), in near-fault and post near-fault earthquakes. Nonlinear time history analyses were con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thin-walled structures 2022-03, Vol.172, p.108892, Article 108892
Main Authors: Lin, Te-Hung, Chou, Chung-Che
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper presents the seismic evaluation of high-strength steel first-story columns in a seven-story dual system, composed of a special moment-resisting frame (SMRF) and buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF), in near-fault and post near-fault earthquakes. Nonlinear time history analyses were conducted on the frame to develop loading protocols that represent seismic demands on the first-story columns in the dual system. The proposed near-fault displacement protocol has a large displacement pulse from -2 to +4% drift, followed by small displacement cycles oscillated at a residual drift of 2.5%. The proposed far-field displacement protocol is an increasingly cyclic displacement protocol with one cycle after a drift of 2%. Two built-up H-shaped column specimens (HC-20-B and HC-20-C) and two built-up box column specimens (HBC-40-B and HBC-40-C), representing the first-story columns in the dual system, are tested under constant axial force (0.2Py or 0.4Py) and lateral drifts based on the proposed loading protocols. These specimens that satisfy the compactness requirement of highly ductile members in AISC 341-16 (2016) show acceptable seismic performance under the near-fault earthquake loading. However, the flexural strength of HC specimens decreases with increasing drift, and that of HBC specimens increases without strength degradation. The HBC specimens can perform well in the subsequent near-fault or far-fielding earthquake loading, which is not the case for the HC specimens due to significant local buckling. The NIST (2017) backbone curve reasonably predicts the test envelope of the HC specimens, but significantly underestimates the test envelope of the HBC specimens. •High-strength steel columns were tested under near-fault and subsequent loadings.•A near-fault loading protocol was developed based on a BRBF in ground motions.•Deep H-shaped columns and box columns were under axial force and lateral drifts.•Backbone curves based on codes are compared with test envelope of specimens.
ISSN:0263-8231
1879-3223
DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2022.108892