Loading…
Beijing’s 50 million new urban trees: Strategic governance for large-scale urban afforestation
•Beijing added more than 50 million trees to its urban forest in four years.•The governance structure behind this mega project was analyzed.•Contradiction between afforestation and agricultural production exists.•Public participation and formation of non-governmental coalition are needed.•A planning...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban forestry & urban greening 2019-08, Vol.44, p.126392, Article 126392 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Beijing added more than 50 million trees to its urban forest in four years.•The governance structure behind this mega project was analyzed.•Contradiction between afforestation and agricultural production exists.•Public participation and formation of non-governmental coalition are needed.•A planning and preparation period for the project is indispensable.
Large-scale urban afforestation projects are increasingly used as a way to enhance urban sustainability. Governance of such projects is challenging yet few studies have examined this topic. Between 2012 and 2015, Beijing City implemented the One Million-Mu (666 km2) Plain Afforestation Project, which has led to over 50 million trees being planted in the city’s plain area and a 10% increase of overall forest cover. We analyzed the governance of this mega planting project through the lens of the Policy Arrangement Approach, with specific attention paid to actors, resources, rules, discourses and their interconnectedness. We found that a strong administrative capacity was in place for the project, and the efficiency and effectiveness of the project were generally good. However, civic participation was insufficient. The extensive use of farmland for afforestation has caused a conflict between the project and farmland conservation. Despite strong leadership of the project, there were still discrepancies between plans and outcomes due to inadequate rule-making during the very short period of planning. Authoritative discourses were dominant through the project, but a few decisions were improperly oriented. Findings from this study can provide important lessons for other cities to plan and implement large urban afforestation projects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1618-8667 1610-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126392 |