Optimisation of 20 kHz sonoreactor geometry on the basis of numerical simulation of local ultrasonic intensity and qualitative comparison with experimental results

The intensity distribution of the ultrasonic energy is, after the frequency, the most significant parameter to characterize ultrasonic fields in any sonochemical experiment. Whereas in the case of low intensity ultrasound the measurement of intensity and its distribution is well solved, in the case...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ultrasonics sonochemistry 2007, Vol.14 (1), p.19-28
Main Authors: Klíma, J., Frias-Ferrer, A., González-García, J., Ludvík, J., Sáez, V., Iniesta, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cell geometry optimisation
Computer Simulation
Computer-Aided Design
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure Analysis
Intensity distribution
Models, Theoretical
Radiation Dosage
Radiometry - methods
Sonication
Ultrasound
Wave equation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The intensity distribution of the ultrasonic energy is, after the frequency, the most significant parameter to characterize ultrasonic fields in any sonochemical experiment. Whereas in the case of low intensity ultrasound the measurement of intensity and its distribution is well solved, in the case of high intensity (when cavitation takes place) the measurement is much more complicated. That is why the predicting the acoustic pressure distribution within the cell is desirable. A numerical solution of the wave equation gave the distribution of intensity within the cell. The calculations together with experimental verification have shown that the whole reactor behaves like a resonator and the energy distribution depends strongly on its shape. The agreement between computational simulations and experiments allowed optimisation of the shape of the sonochemical reactor. The optimal geometry resulted in a strong increase in intensity along a large part of the cell. The advantages of such optimised geometry are (i) the ultrasonic power necessary for obtaining cavitation is low; (ii) low power delivered to the system results in only weak heating, consequently, no cooling is necessary and (iii) the “active volume” is large, i.e. the fraction of the reactor volume with high intensity is large and is not limited to a vicinity close to the horn tip.
ISSN:1350-4177
1873-2828
DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.01.001