Loading…

Insights into the atomic scale structure, bond characteristics and wetting behavior of Cu(001)/Cu6Sn5(110) interface: A first-principles investigation

The atomic scale structure, interfacial bond characteristics and wetting behavior of Cu(001)/Cu6Sn5(110) interface have been investigated by means of first-principles calculations. It is revealed that the surface energies of Cu(001) and Cu6Sn5(110) surface with more than five layers can be converged...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vacuum 2021-05, Vol.187, p.110103, Article 110103
Main Authors: Yang, Wenchao, Wu, Jingwu, Pang, Mingjun, Zhan, Yongzhong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The atomic scale structure, interfacial bond characteristics and wetting behavior of Cu(001)/Cu6Sn5(110) interface have been investigated by means of first-principles calculations. It is revealed that the surface energies of Cu(001) and Cu6Sn5(110) surface with more than five layers can be converged to 1.45 J/m2 and 0.50 J/m2, respectively. It can be concluded that the Interface V, which the Cu atoms of the Cu(001) side are located on the hollow position of the Cu6Sn5(110) side, is the most stable configuration with the smallest interfacial distance, the largest adhesion work and the lowest interfacial energy. The contact angles of five interface configurations were also calculated. The analysis of density of states, electronic density difference, and Mulliken population indicated that the bond characteristics of Cu(001)/Cu6Sn5(110) interface are mainly composed of Sn–Cu and Cu–Cu covalent bonds. •The Cu(001)/Cu6Sn5(110) interface models with two configurations were investigated using DFT.•The surface energies of Cu(001) surface and Cu6Sn5(110) surface are calculated to be 1.45 J/m2 and 0.50 J/m2, respectively.•The Interface V is more stable configuration by the results of the adhesion work and interface energy.•The contact angles of five interface models are also evaluated.
ISSN:0042-207X
1879-2715
DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110103