Loading…
Institutional bricolage as a new perspective to analyse institutions of communal irrigation: Implications towards meeting the water needs of the poor communities
•We use the concepts of institutional bricolage to analyse the institutional aspects of communal irrigation in Ethiopia.•Providing two case studies from Ethiopia, we argue that the poor communities achieve economic efficiency, social equity and ecological sustainability through the adoption of ‘inst...
Saved in:
Published in: | World development perspectives 2018-03, Vol.9, p.1-11 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We use the concepts of institutional bricolage to analyse the institutional aspects of communal irrigation in Ethiopia.•Providing two case studies from Ethiopia, we argue that the poor communities achieve economic efficiency, social equity and ecological sustainability through the adoption of ‘institutional crafting’ is unrealistic.•The universal application of the ‘design principles’ approach is inadequate in explaining institutional formation of communal resources.•We suggest that institutional bricolage is an alternative approach to understand the dynamics and complexities in irrigation.
There is a lack of a clear understanding of the concept of institutions for communal resource management such as irrigation. Using two case studies from Oromia and Tigray National Regional States in Ethiopia and comparing different theoretical approaches, this article aims to analyse the institutional aspects of communal irrigation through the concept of institutional bricolage. In doing so the article seeks to explain the underlying factors for institutional inertia, sub optimal outcomes and dysfunctionality in the cases considered. Following Cleaver, the findings build on the argument that analysis of the social context within which institutional arrangements are embedded is as important as the architecture of institutions themselves. I argue that communal irrigation needs to consider the importance of power relations and processes of negotiation in the definition and enforcement of rules and regulations which in turn require understanding how people’s agency and constraints enable them to engage with informal and formal institutions. Development interventions which recognise the importance of the processes of institutional bricolage have great potential of success and enhance sustainable use of natural resources. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2452-2929 2452-2929 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.wdp.2017.11.003 |