The diagnosis of inflammatory sinonasal disease

• Published in: Journal of laryngology and otology 1995-01, Vol.109 (1), p.27-30
• Main Authors: Roberts, D. N., Hampal, S., East, C. A., Lloyd, G. A. S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diagnosis; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Main Articles; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Non tumoral diseases; Observer Variation; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology; Paranasal Sinuses - diagnostic imaging; Paranasal Sinuses - pathology; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Radiation Dosage; Radiography; Sinusitis; Sinusitis - diagnostic imaging; Sinusitis - pathology; Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology; X-ray computed
• ISSN: 0022-2151; 1748-5460
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022215100129160

A prospective study was carried out on 25 consecutive patients referred to an outpatient clinic at The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, with a medical letter suggestive of sinusitis, to test the hypothesis that the diagnosis of inflammatory sinus disease could be made simply and accurately by employing systematic nasal endoscopy and a series of plain sinus X-rays. The study compared the diagnostic yields of the history, rigid nasal endoscopy and plain sinus films with computed tomography. All the investigations were performed on the same day. The interobserver variability between consultant ENT surgeon, senior registrar and registrar were compared. With heightened concern over the radiation exposure patients are receiving for medical investigations, the radiation exposure was determined for a selected group of patients. This study demonstrated that in the diagnosis of inflammatory sinonasal disease the clinical assessment correlated with the CT findings in over 90 per cent of cases. This accuracy was dependent on the experience of the clinician in using rigid nasal endoscopy. Interobserver variability ranged from 71 to 90.4 per cent in the correct diagnosis of underlying sinus disease. Close agreement was seen with the interpretation of CT scans. The concordance rate between plain films and CT scans was 87 per cent when reported by a consultant radiologist. This is in close agreement with previously reported studies. The average radiation exposure of coronal CT scanning was 218 times the dose for plain sinus X-rays.