Another look at confidence limits for species proportions

In paleontological investigations the number of individuals of a particular species, ni, is often expressed as a proportion of the total number of individuals, ∑i=1S ni = n, for all, S, species. This proportion, p = ni/n expressed in percent, is referred to by various authors as percent species, rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of paleontology 1990-09, Vol.64 (5), p.842-843
Main Author: Buzas, Martin A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ammonia
Binomials
Confidence limits
Paleontological Notes
Proportions
Sediments
Spatial distribution
Standard error
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In paleontological investigations the number of individuals of a particular species, ni, is often expressed as a proportion of the total number of individuals, ∑i=1S ni = n, for all, S, species. This proportion, p = ni/n expressed in percent, is referred to by various authors as percent species, relative abundance, percentage abundance, species frequency, fractional abundance, and so on. Naturally, researchers are interested in the confidence limits that can be placed on these estimates, and in the number of individuals required to obtain them. The binomial distribution was used by Dryden (1931), Dennison and Hay (1967), Wright and Hay (1971), and Patterson and Fishbein (1989) for this purpose.
ISSN:0022-3360
1937-2337
DOI:10.1017/S002233600001903X