Loading…
Calibration of 14 C Histograms: A Comparison of Methods
The interpretation of 14 C histograms is complicated by the non-linearity of the 14 C time scale in terms of calendar years, which may result in clustering of 14 C ages in certain time intervals unrelated to the (geologic or archaeologic) phenomenon of interest. One can calibrate 14 C histograms for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiocarbon 1994, Vol.36 (1), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The interpretation of
14
C histograms is complicated by the non-linearity of the
14
C time scale in terms of calendar years, which may result in clustering of
14
C ages in certain time intervals unrelated to the (geologic or archaeologic) phenomenon of interest. One can calibrate
14
C histograms for such distortions using two basic approaches. The KORHIS method constructs a
14
C histogram before calibration is performed by means of a correction factor. We present the CALHIS method based on the Groningen calibration program for individual
14
C ages. CALHIS first calibrates single
14
C ages and then sums the resulting calibration distributions, thus yielding a calibrated
14
C histogram. The individual calibration distributions are normalized to a standard Gaussian distribution before superposition, thus allowing direct comparison among various
14
C histograms. Several experiments with test data sets demonstrate that CALHIS produces significantly better results than KORHIS. Although some problems remain (part of the distortions due to
14
C variations cannot be eliminated), we show that CALHIS offers good prospects for using
14
C histograms, particularly with highly precise and accurate
14
C ages. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8222 1945-5755 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0033822200014272 |