HOW ECONOMISTS ENTERED THE ‘NUMBERS GAME’: MEASURING DISCRIMINATION IN THE US COURTROOMS, 1971–1989

The paper explores why and how economists entered the courtrooms as expert witnesses in employment discrimination cases in the US. The main sources are published legal decisions. I analyze the courts’ and economists’ discourses on the use of a specific method: multiple regression analysis in relatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2020-06, Vol.42 (2), p.229-259
Main Author: Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, Cléo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Court hearings & proceedings
Courts
Discourses
Economic history
Economic theory
Economics
Economists
Employment discrimination
Expert witness testimony
Federal Rules of Evidence
Human capital
Law
Litigation
Professionalization
Regression analysis
Trials
Wages & salaries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The paper explores why and how economists entered the courtrooms as expert witnesses in employment discrimination cases in the US. The main sources are published legal decisions. I analyze the courts’ and economists’ discourses on the use of a specific method: multiple regression analysis in relation to litigation history, academic debates, and the institutional settings of expertise within the courts. I first show how the early reception of the method in the late 1970s did not involve systematic rejection from the courts but rather a large amount of skepticism. I then illustrate how economic theory underlying the method was progressively introduced in the “judicial tool kit” and how the debates in the courtrooms relate to the debates in academia in the 1980s. By 1989, practical and ethical questions regarding the institutional settings of experts’ testimony took center stage, reflecting the increasing professionalization of forensic economics.
ISSN:1053-8372
0142-7716
1469-9656
DOI:10.1017/S1053837219000646