Accounts of vulnerability within positive human rights obligations

Accounts of human beings as vulnerable have provided powerful reposts to liberal individualism in recent decades. Concurrently, the European Court of Human Rights' jurisprudence on Convention states' positive obligations often obliges public authorities to address particular vulnerabilitie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of law in context 2023-12, Vol.19 (4), p.597–618-597–618
Main Authors: Nikki Godden-Rasu, CRG MURRAY
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitudes
Human rights
Investigation
Judges
Obedience (Law)
Police questioning
Sex crimes
Vulnerability (Personality trait)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Accounts of human beings as vulnerable have provided powerful reposts to liberal individualism in recent decades. Concurrently, the European Court of Human Rights' jurisprudence on Convention states' positive obligations often obliges public authorities to address particular vulnerabilities. These developments reflect elements of different theoretical accounts of vulnerability but lack a coherent approach to the human subject. Exploring the impact of this in the UK Supreme Court's jurisprudence, we evaluate two case studies in which positive obligations have been imposed on the police; (1) public order in the context of inter-community tensions in Northern Ireland ('DB v. Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland') and (2) police investigations in regard to serial sexual offending ('Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v. DSD'). This jurisprudence illustrates how some domestic judges are supplying their decisions with rationalisations which are lacking in the European Court's case law.
ISSN:1744-5523
1744-5531
DOI:10.1017/S1744552323000277