Loading…

Substituent Controllable Assembly of Anthracene Donors and TCNQ Acceptors in Charge Transfer Cocrystals

A series of charge transfer cocrystals composed of methyl-substituted anthracenes (MeAnt or Me2Ant) and F x TCNQ (x = 0, 1, 2) were obtained. All combinations of the donor and acceptor coformers produced 1:1 cocrystals with alternating mixed stacks. The key factors contributing to crystal packing ar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Crystal growth & design 2023-02, Vol.23 (2), p.954-964
Main Authors: Ivshin, Kamil A., Metlushka, Kirill, Fedonin, Anton, Latypov, Shamil K., Khrizanforova, Vera V., Budnikova, Yulia H., Vandyukov, Alexander E., Kiiamov, Airat G., Laskin, Artem, Avdoshenko, Stanislav M., Knupfer, Martin, Kataeva, Olga
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A series of charge transfer cocrystals composed of methyl-substituted anthracenes (MeAnt or Me2Ant) and F x TCNQ (x = 0, 1, 2) were obtained. All combinations of the donor and acceptor coformers produced 1:1 cocrystals with alternating mixed stacks. The key factors contributing to crystal packing are π–π, F···H, N···H, and F···F interactions and the steric effect of the methyl substituents. The introduction of methyl groups into the donor molecules in the series of complexes with F2TCNQ promotes the skewed overlap mode with a large donor–acceptor shift, dipole–dipole interactions between cyano groups, and the three-dimensional (3D) network of intermolecular interactions. Such supramolecular arrangement results in the delocalized electronic structure with a high dispersion of the density of states. The evaluated charge transfer is about 0.16–0.17 e; the donor–acceptor distance within the stacks is 3.30 Å, which is smaller than that in cocrystals of F4TCNQ with anthracene and even tetracene. Solid-state electrochemistry and UV/vis/NIR spectroscopy imply the energy gap for this series of cocrystals of about 0.8–1.1 eV; thus, they may be considered small-gap semiconductors. Our work shows how minor changes in donor or acceptor constituents of cocrystals can result in drastic changes of the packing arrangement and the properties of cocrystals with enhanced donor–acceptor interactions.
ISSN:1528-7483
1528-7505
DOI:10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01146