Loading…
Molten-Phase Unsaturation Enhanced Pyrolytic Upcycling of Polyolefins
Fast pyrolysis is a robust deconstruction technology for chemically upcycling waste plastics without losing significant carbon to noncondensable gases. However, fast pyrolysis of polyolefins often produces hydrocarbons with broad molecular weight distributions, mainly waxes, which can also negativel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy & fuels 2024-09, Vol.38 (17), p.16692-16704 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Fast pyrolysis is a robust deconstruction technology for chemically upcycling waste plastics without losing significant carbon to noncondensable gases. However, fast pyrolysis of polyolefins often produces hydrocarbons with broad molecular weight distributions, mainly waxes, which can also negatively affect the commercial reactor operation and downstream upgrading of the products. We discovered that combining molten-phase thermal treatment with subsequent fast pyrolysis offers a facile method to enhance polyolefin pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading. The molten-phase thermal treatment increased unsaturated C–C bonds in the treated polyolefins. During subsequent pyrolysis, the preheated polyolefins significantly reduced wax range hydrocarbons in the condensable products without an increase in gas formation. The wax yields from pyrolysis of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) preheated to 295 °C and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) preheated to 275 °C were 20.5% and 26.5%, respectively, compared to 38.6% and 46% produced from pyrolyzing untreated polyolefins. When catalytically pyrolyzed using a zeolite catalyst, the preheated polyolefins promoted higher yields of olefins during ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis and higher yields of aromatic hydrocarbons during in-situ catalytic pyrolysis. During ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis, ethylene yields were 23.3% and 24.7% for the preheated HDPE and LDPE compared to 16.7% and 9.3% for untreated HDPE and LDPE, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-0624 1520-5029 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02481 |