Selective Formation and SHG Intensity of Noncentrosymmetric and Centrosymmetric 1,1,2,2-Tetramethyl-1-(4‑(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl)-2-(2′-cyanophenyl)disilane Crystals under External Stimuli

• Published in: Journal of physical chemistry. C 2020-08, Vol.124 (32), p.17450-17458
• Main Authors: Nishio, Masaki, Shimada, Masaki, Omoto, Kenichiro, Nakae, Toyotaka, Maeda, Hiroaki, Miyachi, Mariko, Yamanoi, Yoshinori, Nishibori, Eiji, Nakayama, Naofumi, Goto, Hitoshi, Matsushita, Tomonori, Kondo, Takashi, Hattori, Mineyuki, Jimura, Keiko, Hayashi, Shigenobu, Nishihara, Hiroshi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: C: Energy Conversion and Storage; Energy and Charge Transport
• ISSN: 1932-7447; 1932-7455
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03139

In this paper, selective formation of noncentrosymmetric (Cc; α-crystal) and centrosymmetric ( P 21/c; β-crystal) 1,1,2,2-tetramethyl-1-(4-(N,N-dimethylamino)­phenyl)-2-(2′-cyanophenyl)­disilane (1) was reported and both crystals were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, indicating multiple CH−π interactions created the crystal packing. The second harmonic generation (SHG) activity was attributed to the crystal packing and the orientation of dipole moment. Noncentrosymmetric crystal packing in a parallel manner exhibited SHG activity (intensity: 2.1 times vs urea). On the contrary, centrosymmetric structure in an antiparallel form showed no SHG activity (intensity: 0.0 times vs urea). As the calculated crystal energies of two polymorphs were very close to each other, the regulation of α- and β-crystals is succeeded through supercooled liquid-to-crystal and crystal-to-crystal phase transitions, controlling the SHG activity. Powder XRD and solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy were applied for the qualitative analysis of α- or β-polymorphs.